Para escrever este próximo artigo tive de tirar da equação o controlo climatológico que se faz hoje em dia, e embarcar na teoria de que o mundo está a aquecer por forma a conseguir contra argumentar com factos.
E que novidades tenho para vós. Em Março deste ano a NASA através do seu centro de pesquisa lançou um estudo que refuta veemente (como se isso fosse ainda mais possível) a teoria do aquecimento global provocado pelo Co2.
Não só refutam esta ideia como provam que o Co2 afinal é um importante "cooler", que ajuda de sobremaneira a manter a temperatura ideal no planeta terra.
http://principia-scientific.org/supportnews/latest-news/163-new-discovery-nasa-study-proves-carbon-dioxide-cools-atmosphere.html#.UVYwRz4bXF4.facebook
Principia scientifica
A recent NASA report throws the space agency into conflict with its climatologists after new NASA measurements prove that carbon dioxide acts as a coolant in Earth's atmosphere.
NASA's Langley Research Center has collated data proving that “greenhouse gases” actually block up to 95 percent of harmful solar rays from reaching our planet, thus reducing the heating impact of the sun.
Se for preciso, repito a frase....
The data was collected by Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry, (or SABER). SABER monitors infrared emissions from Earth’s upper atmosphere, in particular from carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitric oxide (NO), two substances thought to be playing a key role in the energy balance of air above our planet’s surface.
NASA's Langley Research Center instruments show that the thermosphere not only received a whopping 26 billion kilowatt hours of energy from the sun during a recent burst of solar activity, but that in the upper atmospheric carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide molecules sent as much as 95% of that radiation straight back out into space.
Será que os vendidos da Quercus, querem saber disto? Em vez de andarem a vender a ideia a burros velhos, começariam por tentar aprender um pouco mais sobre a coisa. Se choca contra os seus interesses? É natural, a verdade têm a tendência para fazer essas mossas.
The shock revelation starkly contradicts the core proposition of the so-called greenhouse gas theory which claims that more CO2 means more warming for our planet. However, this compelling new NASA data disproves that notion and is a huge embarrassment for NASA's chief climatologist, Dr James Hansen and his team over at NASA's GISS.
http://profundaescuridao.blogspot.pt/2012/05/ecociencia-2parte-lxxxi.html
Neste meu artigo dou a conhecer um pouco as ideias de James Hansen, um neo maltusiano convicto, que usa a NASA para criar o alarmismo habitual entre as mulas ecológicas.
Already, the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has been in full retreat after having to concede a 17-year stall in global warming despite levels of atmopheric CO2 rising almost 40 percent in recent decades. The new SABER data now forms part of a real world double whammy against climatologists' computer models that have always been programmed to show CO2 as a warming gas.
É por isso que as ditas mulas adoram os modelos computorizados, basta introduzir os dados da maneira correcta e tenho todos aqueles desastres que o Al Goria mostrou no documentário da vergonha inconveniente.
The SABER evidence also makes a mockery of the statement on the NASA GISS website (by Hansen underling Gavin Schmidt) claiming, "the greenhouse effect keeps the planet much warmer than it would be otherwise." [1]
http://www.giss.nasa.gov/
As NASA's SABER team at Langley admits:
"This is a new frontier in the sun-Earth connection," says associate principal investigator Martin Mlynczak, "and the data we’re collecting are unprecedented."
Over at Principia Scientific International (PSI) greenhouse gas effect (GHE) critic, Alan Siddons is hailing the findings. Siddons and his colleagues have been winning support from hundreds of independent scientists for their GHE studies carried out over the last seven years.
PSI has proved that the numbers fed into computer models by Hansen and others were based on a faulty interpretation of the laws of thermodynamics.
Mas é claro que eles adulteram os resultados, só assim é possível manter a mentira, e a generalidade das pessoas como percebe pouco do assunto, quando ouve alguém como o directo da NASA a afirmar que o mundo está a derreter, é natural que acreditem no homem. Porque não?
As the SABER research report states:
A recent flurry of eruptions on the sun did more than spark pretty auroras around the poles. NASA-funded researchers say the solar storms of March 8th through 10th dumped enough energy in Earth’s upper atmosphere to power every residence in New York City for two years.
“Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats,” explains James Russell of Hampton University, SABER’s principal investigator. “When the upper atmosphere (or ‘thermosphere’) heats up, these molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space.”
Leram bem? Sem truques, sem esquemas de universidades envolvidas em "climategates", é um puro e simples facto constatável e provado.
To those independent scientists and engineers at Principia Scientific International this is not news. The “natural thermostat” effect of CO2 has long been known by applied scientists and engineers how have exploited it's remarkable properties in the manufacturer of refrigerators and air conditioning systems. The fledgling independent science body has repeatedly shown in it's openly peer reviewed papers that atmospheric carbon dioxide does not cause global warming nor climate change.
Some diehard climate alarmists will still say that in the lower atmosphere the action of carbon dioxide is reversed, but there is no actual proof of this at all. PSI suggests it is time for the SABER team to have a word with James Hansen.
Neste meu artigo "A natureza e as Nações Unidas" expus a primeira constituição ambiental que depois de assinada e ratificada, transfere a natureza de cada país para as mãos das Nações Unidas. Um dos "keypoints" é o aquecimento global e as medidas que os países tomarão por forma a evitar o desastre ambiental.
É preciso ver que não é só a nível económico que nos roubam, falta abrir a mente para tudo o resto. Todos os que interessam à ordem mundial estão a fazer o seu trabalho, como o senhor James Hansen, e tu, meu amigo, tens de fazer o teu. E uma das primeiras coisas a fazer é rejeitar este movimento ecológico que nada têm a haver com ecologia, mas sim com controlo.
Assuntos relacionados:
http://profundaescuridao.blogspot.pt/2012/04/co2psec-lxxix.html
http://profundaescuridao.blogspot.pt/2012/05/ecociencia-lxxx.html
