domingo, 17 de fevereiro de 2013

Palavras cruzadas (2ª parte) CIV

Já este ano tivemos pela primeira vez a confirmação, (mas não o choque curiosamente) pelas palavras do ministro da saúde Israelita que a administração de um contraceptivo dado às imigrantes etíopes para efeitos de controlo da natalidade, de facto existia.

A government official has for the first time acknowledged the practice of injecting women of Ethiopian origin with the long-acting contraceptive Depo-Provera.

Health Ministry Director General Prof. Roni Gamzu has instructed the four health maintenance organizations to stop the practice as a matter of course.

Quando vemos um governo a fazer isto às pessoas que acolhe sob condição, damos conta dos maníacos que andam à solta por aquele sitio, premeditação com o intuito de deixar mulheres inférteis e simplesmente executar o programa, é bastante agressivo, digo eu.

The ministry and other state agencies had previously denied knowledge or responsibility for the practice, which was first reported five years ago.

Gamzu’s letter instructs all gynecologists in the HMOs "not to renew prescriptions for Depo-Provera for women of Ethiopian origin if for any reason there is concern that they might not understand the ramifications of the treatment.”

About six weeks ago, on an Educational Television program journalist Gal Gabbay revealed the results of interviews with 35 Ethiopian immigrants. The women’s testimony could help explain the almost 50-percent decline over the past 10 years in the birth rate of Israel’s Ethiopian community. According to the program, while the women were still in transit camps in Ethiopia they were sometimes intimidated or threatened into taking the injection. “They told us they are inoculations,” said one of the women interviewed. “They told us people who frequently give birth suffer. We took it every three months. We said we didn’t want to.”

Para um povo que sofreu todas as atrocidades que conhecemos, isto só é possivel porque tal como no tempo de Hitler, os sionistas não se importavam com os campos de concentração, ou as execuções em massa, sempre se encontraram do lá de fora da vedação, nunca do lado dos judeus.  

Dinastias como os Rockefeller ou os Rothschild ganharam biliões à custa de Hitller, cedendo-lhes a patente da gasolina sintética ou reciclando o dinheiro e ouro roubado aos judeus através do banco BIS, sediado em Basileia e que aglomerava os bancos centrais dos países em guerra. É o mesmo banco que está por detrás do FMI e Banco Mundial.

Mas o próprio povo Israelita que é usado neste jogo, também não se sai nada mal...

Some 500 Jewish adults took part in the survey, answering questions put together by a group of civil rights activists and academics, Haaretz newspaper reported on Tuesday. The survey’s findings revealed that 39 percent of respondents believe there is a ‘slight’ form of apartheid in the country, while 19 percent admit that there is ‘heavy’ apartheid.

Quase 60% dos inquiridos têm  essa percepção de apartheid, é claro, que a amostragem vale o que vale, mas mesmo assim, não deixa de ser curioso esta faceta que raramente nos é mostrada.

A different question suggested that the number of those in favor of ethnic segregation is higher, with 74 percent of those surveyed in favor of separate roads for Jews and Arabs in the West Bank.

On the contentious issue of the West Bank, 38 percent of respondents wanted to annex the territories with settlements, and 48 percent opposed that policy. A followup question on voting rights for Palestinians saw 69 percent of respondents in favor of denying 2.5 million of Palestinians the vote if West Bank territories were annexed.

More than a half of those questioned said Jews should be given preference over Arabs when applying for jobs in the government sector. And slightly under half favored legalized discrimination of Arabs, saying that the state should “treat Jewish citizens better than Arab ones.”
Na África do Sul dá-se razão a esta sondagem.

The Human Sciences Research Council of South Africa (HSRC) has released a report confirming that Israel is practicing both colonialism and apartheid in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT).

The project was suggested originally by the January 2007 report by eminent South African jurist John Dugard, in his capacity as Special Rapporteur to the United Nations Human Rights Council, when he indicated that Israeli practices had assumed characteristics of colonialism and apartheid.

The Report finds that Israeli practices in the OPT exhibit the same three “pillars” of apartheid:

The first pillar “derives from Israeli laws and policies that establish Jewish identity for purposes of law and afford a preferential legal status and material benefits to Jews over non-Jews.”

The second pillar is reflected in “Israel’s ‘grand’ policy to fragment the OPT [and] ensure that Palestinians remain confined to the reserves designated for them while Israeli Jews are prohibited from entering those reserves but enjoy freedom of movement throughout the rest of the Palestinian territory.

The third pillar is “Israel’s invocation of ‘security’ to validate sweeping restrictions on Palestinian freedom of opinion, expression, assembly, association and movement [to] mask a true underlying intent to suppress dissent to its system of domination and thereby maintain control over Palestinians as a group.”

Sem comentários:

Enviar um comentário